Prismatica We build AI systems that run reliably under real load — knowledge graph intelligence, workflow automation, and process intelligence. Not API wrappers. Not proof-of-concept experiments.
The demo works. The board approves the budget. Six months later, the system is fragile, expensive to run, and producing answers nobody trusts.
This isn't a technology problem. It's a depth problem. Most teams build AI by stacking APIs — OpenAI here, a vector database there, a prompt engineering layer that holds the whole thing together with string. It looks like a product. It isn't.
Production AI needs internals that are actually understood: how knowledge is structured, how the model retrieves it, how the feedback loop improves it over time. Without that, you're not building intelligence. You're building a demo that sometimes gives the right answer.
We structure your domain knowledge in graphs, not unstructured vector embeddings alone. Better retrieval, traceable reasoning, answers that are actually defensible.
End-to-end process automation across tools, systems, and data sources. The kind that removes whole categories of manual work — not just individual clicks.
Autonomous agents that complete multi-step tasks, handle exceptions, and improve over time. Built with feedback loops baked into the architecture.
We design RAG pipelines correctly — with proper chunking strategies, retrieval quality monitoring, and cost-aware inference. Not the tutorial implementation most teams ship.
If your product needs intelligence added without a rebuild, we'll design the integration so it complements your architecture rather than fighting it.
We build feedback loops into every AI engagement. The system learns from corrections, improves its retrieval, and reduces inference cost as it matures. It compounds.
Knowledge graph architectures produce decisions you can audit. When a business-critical AI system gives an answer, you need to know why — not just what.
We design for low inference cost from the architecture stage, not after the cloud bill arrives. Lower token counts, smarter retrieval, right-sized models.
We design our AI systems to be provider-agnostic. OpenAI, Anthropic, open-source — the architecture doesn't depend on one provider's API terms staying favourable.
We don't start with models. We start with the problem: what decision do you need to automate, what data exists, what does "correct" look like, and how will you know when it's wrong. Most AI failures start here — with unclear success criteria.
We design the knowledge model, retrieval strategy, and integration points before writing a prompt. This is where we decide whether knowledge graphs, RAG, fine-tuning, or agentic workflows are right — not after spending money on the wrong approach.
We build in stages with clear validation gates. Each phase has measurable quality criteria — retrieval accuracy, answer correctness, cost per inference — so you know it's working before it reaches users.
We ship to production with monitoring, feedback capture, and a clear improvement loop. The system goes live with a plan to get better — not just a plan to maintain.
AI built into the product from the architecture stage, not integrated as an afterthought.
AI needs clean, well-structured data. We'll sort both.
AI workloads need the right infrastructure: GPU scheduling, model serving, cost controls.
Cloud architecture decisions matter when running AI at scale. We design for them upfront.
Describe the problem — the manual process, the decision you want to automate, the data you have. We'll tell you what's possible, what it will take, and whether it's worth it.
No commitment. An honest technical assessment of your AI opportunity.